EENET asia Newsletters : Symposium
issue April 2006 Contents
An Experience of Emergency
Preparedness Planning in Early Learning Centres
Divya Lata
The purpose of this article is to share
the experience and insights gained from undertaking emergency preparedness
planning in two early learning centers affected by the Asian Tsunami in
Sri Lanka. At the outset, it is acknowledged that the experiences have
been preliminary and extremely limited in scale. However, they offer practical
‘starting points’ to similar initiatives and help staff, when
working in extremely demanding situations, as is often the case in emergencies,
to better respond and cope.
The challenge
The need for emergency preparedness planning is well recognised in international
guidelines for relief and rehabilitation and are reflected in plans proposed
and resources allocated by most agencies involved with emergencies. However,
it is also a common experience that implementing agencies find it difficult
to implement these plans with the desired urgency, scope and scale. Some
of the challenges faced in the context of post-Tsunami rehabilitation
were:
- need for technical guidance among field
staff compounded with limited availability of time for training under
pressure of achievement targets;
- desire to undertake a multi-sectoral, area-wide
process for preparedness through local leadership and administrative
structures, which had the potential for forging effective links and
avoiding duplication but was often unwieldy and coordinating agencies
were stretched
- limited availability of time with the community,
fatigued by repeated visits by a number of agencies undertaking needs
assessments and situation analysis and the perception that it would
be inappropriate to discuss preparedness with communities still unsettled
by the disaster.
The process
In view of those challenges it was decided to undertake the planning exercise
as a hands-on Training-of-Trainers (TOT) which would meet some of the
achievement targets of field teams. It was also agreed to develop the
preparedness process bottom-upwards with the focus on early learning centres,
and establishing wider linkages with other sectors and agencies as required
by the unfolding process. The third key aspect was to develop the plans
based on the data and knowledge available with the community and seek
out technical details as required, rather than top-load the process with
a lot of technical information. The key objectives of the TOT were:
- To develop the framework of emergency preparedness
and response in two early learning centres;
- To undertake a hands-on Training-of-Trainers
to develop procedures for emergency preparedness and response in early
learning centres and develop the outline of a resource guide for their
use.
Preparatory activities included agreement on
a broad framework of the workshop with participating area teams (taking
into account any activities already initiated) and identification of a
core group of functionaries to initiate Emergency Preparedness planning
in early learning centres. The site chosen for the workshop had easy access
to two preschools that were affected by the Tsunami and an agreement with
community members (including children) to engage with the planning process.
The workshop included preparation of facilitation tools, especially for
including children in the discussions, appropriate translations of key
handouts and logistics arrangements.
Workshop sessions included preparatory work
with the core teams to enable them to undertake discussions with members
of the community regarding emergency preparedness as well as hands-on
sessions in the community to initiate the participatory planning process
with a focus on the preschool centres. Key sessions included the following:
- Preparation for community dialogue
- Situation analysis with the community
- Understanding technical issues in emergency
preparedness
- Session planning for community workshop
- Community workshop for emergency preparedness
in early learning centres
- Follow-up planning
Some insights:
Preparedness planning enhances the
confidence of the affected community
During review, participants noted that the initiative generated a lot
of interest in the community. The seed of the idea was planted and people
were keen to develop village-level plans. It gave them a sense of control
over their lives, which itself seemed to be therapeutic. Community members
including children gave new, different and feasible ideas to incorporate
in the plans. Children’s needs were put on the table and shared
with adults; children expressed happiness with this outcome and wanted
more of such opportunities in the future.
Capacity building needs to directly
contribute to achievement of targets (critical in emergencies)
In an emergency, there is a strong need for technical guidance among field
staff, many of whom are new to the organisation as well as the sector
they are working in. While the need for guidance is reflected in search
for ‘experts’, modules and practical ‘how-to’
guidelines, available material is of little help as staff find it difficult
to quickly read and internalise it. This is compounded with limited availability
of time for training as staff are recruited and deployed to expedite delivery
of goods and services, often at a phenomenal speed under an expanded programme
with limited capacity. The task orientation of this hands-on workshop
enabled the process to get support from area managers, who were responsible
for ensuring achievement targets were met. Without this it would have
been impossible to get the process underway for want of staff time. The
exponential potential of the TOT further enabled them to see the value
of the workshop in meeting the larger need.
Hands-on processes provide for effective
learning
TOT participants also said that it was useful to learn in a hands-on workshop,
working directly with the preschool, to understand the concept of emergency
preparedness through direct action. They felt the process was inclusive
and women and children also participated. This enabled them to learn a
range of skills such as facilitation, session planning, tools for participatory
discussion and communicating with children. The workshop addressed the
process of planning through a direct understanding of the situation and
limited the use of technical terminology. This enabled the field-staff
to develop their own thinking on the issues before getting into nuances
of jargon and getting lost in “analysis paralysis” of terminology.
However, the need for information on practical issues such as established
practices of emergency procedures (e.g. evacuation process, verification
of children etc.) was prominent.
It was also notable that community members
continued to ask for ‘experts’ to help them plan, while they
already have much of the knowledge required for preliminary planning (e.g.
safe location of preschools, identification of safe areas, exit points,
distances, routes, means of transport, provision for care of children
and reducing uncertainty and fear etc.). It will be critical to work through
these mind-sets to build on the feelings of being ‘in-charge’
experienced by the community through the workshop.
Divya Lata
has lead the country education programme of Aga Khan Foundation in India
and worked in Afghanistan, Armenia, Bangladesh, Laos and Sri Lanka. Most
recently she was an advisor to Save the Children UK, to provide technical
backstopping to steer the Tsunami response on Early years for Save
the Children in Sri Lanka. She can be contacted at: Divya_lata@yahoo.co.in.
EENET asia
Newsletters : Symposium issue April 2006
Contents
|