EENET
asia Newsletters : inaugural issue JUNE
2005 Contents
Child-Friendly Schools with
Ethnic Minorities
Marc Wetz
For several years Marc Wetz was responsible
for Education in the UNICEF office for Northern Thailand. Since he took
over his new position as Country Representative for Enfants et Développement
in October 2003 he has implemented the Child-Friendly concept in two projects
in remote mountainous ethnic minority areas of Northern Vietnam. In this
article he is sharing some important factors that have contributed to
the success of the CFS concept in an ethnic minority context.
All schools need to become child friendly
- Not only primary schools
I am amazed that many organizations still plan to implement CFS in Primary
Schools only. Advantages of applying the CFS concept in pre-, primary
as well as secondary schools are evident. Do we want to expose children
to harsh critic, even physical abuse in secondary school if they participate
in the classroom with an inquiring and pro-active mind as they were taught
in Child-Friendly Primary Schools? In that case we better leave them alone
instead of confusing children, teachers and community members!
Complement the CFS initiative with a Child Friendly Village/Family initiative
Many reasons why children have difficult access to school and difficulties
in continuing to stay in school are to be found in communities. CFS does
incite schools to get proactively involved in community initiatives, which
is good but let’s be not only child friendly but teacher friendly
as well. We should link CFS with a child friendly community/families initiative
that could take care of the general improvement of the living standards
in the villages as well as help finding solutions for low attendance rates.
Implementation of all CFS components/
dimensions at the same time
In areas with such huge challenges in terms of access and retention, like
in most ethnic minority areas, there is often a tendency to only focus
on setting up enough and accessible classes and improve the physical environment
of schools. However other dimensions, especially the psycho-social environment
(e.g. active learning, child centered teaching methodologies and life
skills) are as important and should be implemented right from the beginning.
All CFS dimensions are inter-related and enhance each other. What is the
sense of improving access to schools if once in school the children do
not want to stay because they are hit, can not voice their opinions, the
curriculum is not adapted to their needs, or it is no fun in school? Great
school infrastructure will not achieve the goal of keeping all children
in school. Activities in the field of psycho-social environment are important
pull factors and if not included into our CFS implementation strategy
can become a push factor.
Adaptation of CFS to the local context
through identification of unique priorities of each geographic area (external
and internal indicators)
Schools are exposed to different social and economic contexts in ethnic
minority areas than in the ethnic majority areas. This has to be taken
into account by the schools and they must therefore set up their own priorities
instead of taking on the priorities of the ethnic majority. This is absolutely
essential and if it is done with high participation of children and community
members it will significantly contribute to the development of ownership
towards CFS initiatives. A method that has proven to be successful is
to let stakeholders reflect on external criteria and set up their own
internal criteria during CFS consultation meetings. It is very important
that the main priorities of children (e.g. ‘teachers should speak
slowly and with a pleasant voice’) and community members are respected
when the final set of criteria/indicators are established.
Enabling high participation of children
and community members
This is not only important for ethnic minority groups, however in those
it is crucial due to the fact that ethnic minorities often have low self-esteem,
do not understand the national language the teachers speak and might themselves
have been in school only for two or three years. They usually feel that
they do not have the capacity to get involved in school affairs and that
school is an alien place. Even if it is challenging the benefits of including
them in all steps of the CFS initiative are immense as they usually respond
enthusiastically once true participation and trust has been build. A proven
participation process is to include them right from the beginning in CRC
sensitizations, visualization of their ‘dream-school’, setting
up their own CFS criteria, school self assessment, setting up an yearly
school development plan and in the monitoring process of the implementation
through appropriate and adapted monitoring tools for children and community
members.
Implementing a local curriculum for
making education more appropriate to the context and as a first step to
let schools become community-friendly
A good way to make school curricula more appropriate to local context
is to develop local or indigenous curricula. All ethnic communities have
a wealth of local resource persons who could teach/transmit local knowledge
in the schools [e.g. livelihood skills like weaving, language, beliefs,
history, stories, songs etc.] These local resource persons would need
some in-service training and support from the teachers as they do not
have necessarily the capacity to teach in school settings. Including local
curricula in the CFS initiative is not only beneficial in making education
more appropriate to the local context but through bringing community members
into schools it helps making the school part of the local community. This
process returns self-esteem to ethnic minorities. It proves that not only
‘external knowledge’ is relevant for the life of their children
but their own local/indigenous knowledge as well. Reducing the gap between
communities and schools is also an excellent basis for adult learning
(adults using schools for literacy classes and life-long learning) and
make schools not only child and teacher friendly but community friendly
as well.
Boarding facilities should not be left
as they provide an excellent opportunity for introducing Life Skills Activities
Many ethnic minority areas are not densely populated. We cannot expect
that each child will have in the future a lower secondary school at less
than 2 hour travelling distance as there will be not enough children to
create more schools. Therefore appropriate boarding facilities are a must
for each CFS. They need to be healthy, safe and protective (crucial for
adolescent girls) and provide an excellent opportunity to conduct extra-curriculum
activities like interest clubs with Livelihood and Life Skills Training
which can be a good entry point to introduce such activities in the schools
Advocacy for ethnic minority friendly
policies
A CFS initiative should include efforts to make government policies more
child friendly for ethnic minority groups. For instance a flexible school
year should be possible to accommodate harvest time and the cold winter
period in order to increase the attendance rate. There is a need for flexible
and adapted curriculum as well as for schools proactively including married
children.
Marc Wetz
is Country Representative for Enfants et Développement (former
Save the Children France)
He can be contacted at:
103 Van Phuc Building
No 2 Nui Truc
Kim Ma
Hanoi
Vietnam
Email: mwetz@eedvn.org
EENET asia
Newsletters : inaugural issue JUNE 2005
Contents
|